An adjudicator is the custodian of a PSI, not the owner.

An adjudicator is the custodian of a PSI, not the owner.

• A. False
• B. True
• C. Not sure
• D. Not applicable

Answer: (B)

The main idea is that an adjudicator handles PSI as a custodian, not as the owner. Being the custodian means you are entrusted with safeguarding and managing the information on behalf of its owner. You control who can access it, ensure it’s kept confidential, and use it only for the purposes of the adjudication, all while preserving its integrity and complying with data-protection rules. Ownership, on the other hand, remains with the party who provided the PSI or with the entity that holds the rights to it. This distinction matters because custodianship emphasizes responsibility for security, access control, retention and destruction, and proper use—without implying any ownership or entitlement to profits from the information. So the statement aligns with how PSI is typically governed in adjudication: the adjudicator is the caretaker, not the owner.

The main idea is that an adjudicator handles PSI as a custodian, not as the owner. Being the custodian means you are entrusted with safeguarding and managing the information on behalf of its owner. You control who can access it, ensure it’s kept confidential, and use it only for the purposes of the adjudication, all while preserving its integrity and complying with data-protection rules. Ownership, on the other hand, remains with the party who provided the PSI or with the entity that holds the rights to it. This distinction matters because custodianship emphasizes responsibility for security, access control, retention and destruction, and proper use—without implying any ownership or entitlement to profits from the information. So the statement aligns with how PSI is typically governed in adjudication: the adjudicator is the caretaker, not the owner.